Skip to main content
EPA VIOLATIONS — 2026 SDWIS DATA

Top 25 cities with the most EPA water violations

The EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System tracks violations at every public water system in the country. A violation means a public water system failed to meet a federal standard — either by exceeding a maximum contaminant level, failing to monitor, or failing to notify residents. Here are the cities with the worst records.

25
Cities rated high concern
0
Cities flagged to monitor
All 50
States covered, all free
WHAT AN EPA VIOLATION ACTUALLY MEANS

A violation doesn't always mean your water is dangerous right now — but it does mean your public water system failed to meet a federal standard at some point. Health-based violations (exceeding a maximum contaminant level) are the most serious. Monitoring violations mean the public water system failed to test and report as required.

Importantly, EPA legal limits are set based on what's technically and economically feasible — not always what independent health scientists consider safe. A system with zero violations can still have water quality concerns.

TOP 25 CITIES — RANKED BY VIOLATION CONCERN
#1
New York City, NYHigh concern
PFAS detected above EPA limits (PFOS 106 ppt, limit: 4 ppt) · 8.3M residents
Report →
#2
Las Vegas, NVHigh concern
Extremely hard water · 650K residents
Report →
#3
New Orleans, LAHigh concern
Lead contamination · 380K residents
Report →
#4
San Diego, CAHigh concern
Imported water vulnerability · 1.4M residents
Report →
#5
Bakersfield, CAHigh concern
1,2,3-TCP pesticide · 380K residents
Report →
#6
Henderson, NVHigh concern
Extremely hard water · 320K residents
Report →
#7
Scottsdale, AZHigh concern
Hard water · 240K residents
Report →
#8
Chula Vista, CAHigh concern
Chromium-6 · 270K residents
Report →
#9
Miami, FLHigh concern
PFAS violations across 4 compounds · 2.8M residents
Report →
#10
Fort Worth, TXHigh concern
PFAS above EPA limits · 936K residents
Report →
#11
Columbus, OHHigh concern
Regulated PFAS above EPA limits · 905K residents
Report →
#12
Dallas, TXHigh concern
PFAS above EPA MCL · 1.3M residents
Report →
#13
Sacramento, CAHigh concern
PFAS 41 ppt — 3 MCL violations · 524K residents
Report →
#14
Pensacola, FLHigh concern
PFAS at 220 ppt — 4 MCL violations · 55K residents
Report →
#15
Fresno, CAHigh concern
PFAS at 47 ppt — 3 MCL violations · 546K residents
Report →
#16
Austin, TXHigh concern
PFAS detected above EPA limits · 1.1M residents
Report →
#17
Fairfax, VAHigh concern
PFAS at 21.9 ppt · 1.1M residents
Report →
#18
Chicago, ILHigh concern
Lead service lines · 2.7M residents
Report →
#19
Los Angeles, CAHigh concern
Chromium-6 (hexavalent chromium) · 4M residents
Report →
#20
Phoenix, AZHigh concern
High TDS / hard water · 1.6M residents
Report →
#21
Philadelphia, PAHigh concern
Lead service lines · 1.6M residents
Report →
#22
Detroit, MIHigh concern
Lead service lines · 630K residents
Report →
#23
Baltimore, MDHigh concern
Lead service lines · 580K residents
Report →
#24
Memphis, TNHigh concern
PFAS contamination · 630K residents
Report →
#25
Louisville, KYHigh concern
Ohio River contamination · 630K residents
Report →
Check your specific ZIP code

City-wide rankings show the pattern — your specific water system may be better or worse. Enter your ZIP for a full EPA report on your exact public water system.

Check My Water Free →
RELATED RANKINGS
Worst cities for PFAS
Top 50 by PFAS contamination
Worst cities for lead
Highest lead risk by city
Worst states overall
State-by-state ranking
What violations mean
Plain-language explanation