Is NPS-BADLANDS NP-WHITE RIVER VC Water Safe to Drink in 2026?
South Dakota · PWSID SD4680043 · Ground water
Population served
50
Cities served
INTERIOR
State / jurisdiction
South Dakota (SD)
PWSID
SD4680043
C
TAP WATER GRADE
Concerning
Model score 63/88 from violations, PFAS profile, and monitoring signals — not a laboratory test of your faucet.
1 violation record(s) in the latest EPA SDWA quarterly snapshot
Water operator? Publish your official 2027 CCR here — residents already find this page. Claim free →
CONTAMINANTS — EPA UCMR5 MONITORING
No UCMR5 PFAS detects on file for this PWS in our bundled national dataset — the system may be smaller than UCMR5 thresholds, had non-detects, or results are not yet linked to this ID. Your retailer Annual Water Quality Report lists other regulated contaminants (chlorine, DBPs, nitrates, etc.).
VIOLATIONS HISTORY (FEDERAL SNAPSHOT)
EPA’s national SDWA quarterly files associate 1 violation-related record with this system in the same reporting quarter as the utility snapshot used on WaterCheckup. This is not a complete historical docket — see ECHO and SDWIS for full compliance context.
Based on NPS-BADLANDS NP-WHITE RIVER VC's monitoring and violation profile, here are vetted filtration options — same picks framework as our city reports.
TOP PICKS FOR NPS-BADLANDS NP-WHITE RIVER VC
⚠ EPA violations / contaminants in monitoring data
WHY THIS FOR NPS-BADLANDS NP-WHITE RIVER VC · Chosen for NPS-BADLANDS NP-WHITE RIVER VC because EPA’s SDWA snapshot shows active violation records. RO addresses a wide range of regulated contaminants, not just chlorine taste.
Get water quality alerts for NPS-BADLANDS NP-WHITE RIVER VC
We'll notify you when new PFAS data, EPA violations, or contamination alerts affect NPS-BADLANDS NP-WHITE RIVER VC (PWS SD4680043). One email, no spam, unsubscribe any time.